Here's Bobby Jindal on Face the Nation
, being asked about evolution (via Pharyngula
REID: Let me make a sharp turn here to a different issue, an issue that has raised some controversy. Now, you were a biology major in college. I think you had a double major. But you were a biology major, and you support the teaching of intelligent design in schools. Do you have doubts about the theory of evolution?
Gov. JINDAL: A couple of things. One, I don’t think this is something the federal or state government should be imposing its views on local school districts. You know, as a conservative I think government that’s closest to the people governs best. I think local school boards should be in a position of deciding the curricula and also deciding what students should be learning. Secondly, I don’t think students learn by us withholding information from them. Some want only to teach intelligent design, some only want to teach evolution. I think both views are wrong, as a parent.
REID: But how about you personally? Where do you stand personally on the issue?
Gov. JINDAL: As a parent, when my kids go to schools, when they go to public schools, I want them to be presented with the best thinking. I want them to be able to make decisions for themselves. I want them to see the best data. I personally think that the life, human life and the world we live in wasn’t created accidentally. I do think that there’s a creator. I’m a Christian. I do think that God played a role in creating not only earth, but mankind. Now, the way that he did it, I’d certainly want my kids to be exposed to the very best science. I don’t want them to be–I don’t want any facts or theories or explanations to be withheld from them because of political correctness. The way we’re going to have smart, intelligent kids is exposing them to the very best science and let them not only decide, but also let them contribute to that body of knowledge.
That’s what makes the scientific process so exciting. You get to go there and find facts and data and test what’s come before you and challenge those theories.
I don't know if he's already got handlers toning down what he says in preparation for a possible VP bid, but I think this answer is designed to be sufficiently vague and yet sound reasonable.
However, he contradicts himself. First he says that teaching evolution only is wrong, then implies that both ID and evolution should be presented. Then he says that kids should be exposed to the very best science and allowed to make up their minds.
Well, evolution is the very best science. And ID is not science at all. It has no workable hypotheses or testable predictions. So if he really wants kids to be exposed to the very best science
, then evolution should be taught in the schools, and ID should be left to the pulpit.