Ramblings on Writing
Reviews, Rants, and Observations on SF/F/H

I am a thirty-something speculative fiction writer. More importantly to this blog, I am a reader of science fiction, horror, and science fiction. Recently it came to my attention that there are very few places reviewing short stories in the genres that I love. I also had the epiphany that I had not been reading enough of these stories. So, an idea was born to address both of these issues.

So, starting in September 2012, this silly little blog of mine that has more or less been gathering dust will be dedicated to looking at and reviewing short form works published both in print magazines and in on-line formats.

Reviews will be posted at least once a month, hopefully more, and stories will be selected completely at my whim. However, if you have read something amazing, thought-provoking, or interesting, please feel free to drop me a recommendation.

Because a big part of the point of this exercise is to improve my own writing by looking at people doing it successfully, I will only be selecting stories to look at from professional or semi-professional markets.

Please note, however, because a big part of the point of this exercise is to improve my own writing by looking at people doing it successfully, I will only be selecting stories to look at from professional or semi-professional markets.

I intend to write honest, and hopefully interesting, reviews to let people know more about the wide variety of fantastic (both in subject and quality) stories out there. There will be no personal attacks on authors and no excoriating hatchet jobs. There is nothing to be learned from reviewing truly bad work and nothing to be gained by being mean. I will not do it and, should I be so lucky as to get readers and commentators, I would ask that they not do so either. Be respectful and everyone gets to have a more interesting conversation.

What I will do is to give my honest and reasoned reactions to stories and try to determine why or why not particular elements worked. I will try to acknowledge my personal biases and to become more open-minded about those things that are not in the realm of my personal preference.

Also, because this is my blog and I can, there may be occasional entries on my own writing process, things I find interesting, or whatever else I feel inclined to add. This may all crash and burn spectacularly, but it's going to be a heck of a lot of fun in the meantime.

Previous Entry :: Next Entry

Mood:
Tired

Read/Post Comments (0)
Share on Facebook



For Sophia, Worldcon - Day One

My writing buddy who cannot be here asked me to do some entries on my experiences at Worldcon. One day in, I can say with certainty that I am already exhausted.

Then again, I did get up at 3 a.m. to make my flight, so that's to be expected.

Now, for some less 'Well, duh' observations:

1. I am at a weird stage in my career.

I went to a panel on how to obtain an agent, and honestly, having been pursuing one for some months now, what I got out of it was that I am mostly going about it the right way. Probably because I attended pretty much the exact same panel at last years Worldcon.

So, I am slightly past the point where this and the panels on scams writers face are new to me. I have most of this information. The validation of methods is nice, but not necessary.

However, I am not yet at the point where the panels on estate planning or writer/editor relationships is entirely relevant to me either. I'm going to them anyway so I have the information *before* I need it, but I can't say they fill me with a sense of 'I must go to that' I have had about panels in the past.

2. Actually, I am not particularly excited about the programming this year in general. There are many panels dedicated to areas of interest specific to Texas, or to authors who had a big impact here in particular. Granted, the con is in Texas this year, so this isn't weird. But, such regionally specific discussion does seem to be a larger percentage of the programming at this con than similar content was other years. This may be because there are a lot of largely general topics such as multilingualism or border issues in fiction which come up as concerns in places like this more than where I am from in addition to the panels on Texas gothic and such. So, while those general topics have broader application, they feel regional is scope.

Or, it could be that exhaustion has made me delusional. Tomorrow I may think the program is heavily slanted towards pink elephants in fantasy.

Even if not, I suspect a solid six hours of sleep will make what seems like lackluster panels a lot more interesting if only because I will once again have enough energy to care about more than not getting a horrible sunburn and finding the nearest coffee distribution point.

3. Even if I don't find that buried passion for the panels, that's okay. This con, as I think I mentioned before, is about different things for me this year. I believe I have talked to more people today than I did the entire con last year.

And they are awesome. Why the heck wasn't I out there getting to know people sooner?

4. I have a habit of expanding to fill all available space. This is the first time I have roomed with someone I had not previously known for a decade, and I have become obsessively aware of every item placed anywhere in the room.

Mind you, the awareness hasn't stopped me from spreading out. I'm just trying to be neater about it. I made sure to hang up my wet towels, for example.

I may be the worst person ever to have as a hotel roommate.

Now I need to go and find a cup of coffee so I can stay awake long enough to attend the Writers' Workshop Meet & Greet. More insights tomorrow.


Read/Post Comments (0)

Previous Entry :: Next Entry

Back to Top

Powered by JournalScape © 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved.
All content rights reserved by the author.
custsupport@journalscape.com