Ramblings on Writing Reviews, Rants, and Observations on SF/F/H I am a thirty-something speculative fiction writer. More importantly to this blog, I am a reader of science fiction, horror, and science fiction. Recently it came to my attention that there are very few places reviewing short stories in the genres that I love. I also had the epiphany that I had not been reading enough of these stories. So, an idea was born to address both of these issues. So, starting in September 2012, this silly little blog of mine that has more or less been gathering dust will be dedicated to looking at and reviewing short form works published both in print magazines and in on-line formats. Reviews will be posted at least once a month, hopefully more, and stories will be selected completely at my whim. However, if you have read something amazing, thought-provoking, or interesting, please feel free to drop me a recommendation. Because a big part of the point of this exercise is to improve my own writing by looking at people doing it successfully, I will only be selecting stories to look at from professional or semi-professional markets. Please note, however, because a big part of the point of this exercise is to improve my own writing by looking at people doing it successfully, I will only be selecting stories to look at from professional or semi-professional markets. I intend to write honest, and hopefully interesting, reviews to let people know more about the wide variety of fantastic (both in subject and quality) stories out there. There will be no personal attacks on authors and no excoriating hatchet jobs. There is nothing to be learned from reviewing truly bad work and nothing to be gained by being mean. I will not do it and, should I be so lucky as to get readers and commentators, I would ask that they not do so either. Be respectful and everyone gets to have a more interesting conversation. What I will do is to give my honest and reasoned reactions to stories and try to determine why or why not particular elements worked. I will try to acknowledge my personal biases and to become more open-minded about those things that are not in the realm of my personal preference. Also, because this is my blog and I can, there may be occasional entries on my own writing process, things I find interesting, or whatever else I feel inclined to add. This may all crash and burn spectacularly, but it's going to be a heck of a lot of fun in the meantime. |
||
:: HOME :: GET EMAIL UPDATES :: Ralan Market List :: WotF Contest :: Nancy Kress's Blog :: R-SPEC: Rochester Speculative Literature Association :: Writers and Books :: Magical Words :: EMAIL :: | ||
Read/Post Comments (0) |
2013-10-30 1:09 PM STORY REVIEW: "The Truth of Fact, the Truth of Feeling" This story can be found in the Fall 2013 issue of Subterranean Press at http://subterraneanpress.com/magazine/fall_2013/the_truth_of_fact_the_truth_of_feeling_by_ted_chiang
I like Ted Chiang. I think he has a beautiful way with prose and that his word choice often borders on magical. That said, I did not like this story. Before I get into my very specific problems with "The Truth of Fact, the Truth of Feeling," let me cover the things I did like. As in all Chiang works I have seen, the prose is fluid and often lyrical. This tale was easy to read, to follow, and to enjoy on that level. Also, I very much enjoyed some of the concepts of the piece. It combined the exploration of memory and experience as both synergistic and deeply fallible with the rising trends of both personal reporting (blogs, social media, etc) and the proliferation of video recording (cell phones) in a way that was both intriguing and vaguely unsettling. However, the story, perhaps deliberately given the subject matter, felt very much like reading someone's diary. There was very little dramatization or character interaction. For me this made it very hard to care on an emotional level about anything happening in the narrative because I inherently removed from the emotional core of it. In fact, I was removed on multiple levels. The structure was that the narrator (who proves to be deeply unreliable) is talking in this blog-like format about a story he is writing about a new technology. This is doubly-distancing as the format is not only inherently expository, but the narrator himself is removed from his own emotions as well. On a meta level, this kind of writing exercise is fascinating. The format plays into the concept and the first-person telling by the narrator reveals as much in what is left out by what is included. Intellectually, it is clever and interesting. But, as a story in its own right, it fell flat. While the ideas in the structure are smart, they do not make for a satisfying reading experience. Instead, at least for me, the characters came across as two-dimensional and the situations flat. Yes, the concept of the technology was interesting, and the explorations of its positives and negatives well-done. But, to me the story lacked heart and tension and drama. All the things I read to find. At the end, while I was left with a lot to think about, I felt very little. Read/Post Comments (0) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |