Thinking as a Hobby 3477255 Curiosities served |
2003-04-17 10:23 AM Potsdam Lite Previous Entry :: Next Entry Read/Post Comments (2) The establishment of a military leadership of Japan under General MacArthur was established by the Potsdam Declaration.
It seems to me that in order to placate Arab and other international sensitivities, we're basically going to try to implement a Potsdam Lite, a half-assed attempt at establishing a strong short-term presence, gradually doling out authority to a responsible, stable, democratic government as it emerges. This could very well be a recipe for disaster. Some Shiite leaders are calling for the U.S. to withdraw right now. Which is effing crazy. The place would descend into anarchy and in-fighting beyond anything we've seen so far. No, we've got to establish a very strong, guiding force in Iraq, and build the framework to get them on their feet, even if it pisses off the Arab world, or even those in Iraq. We shouldn't just throw the country to the dogs wanting to fight over the scraps of power, and we shouldn't hedge our bets by trying to be overly polite. Those are both recipes for failure. The Bush Administration doesn't want to put a timeline on reconstruction, but I've heard some estimates ranging from three weeks to 3-6 months. Are they kidding? I'm one American who signed up for the long haul when the talk of war began, realizing that democratizing Iraq was going to be a long, expensive ordeal. And I'm ready for that. Anyone else who supported the war effort should have as well. It's wholly unrealistic to expect to slap together anything resembling a functioning government and economy in 3-6 months. We should follow the Potsdam Declaration, in its intent and to a certain extent, in its firm tone. Here are some sample sections. Imagine substituting "Iraq" for "Japan", and see how they read.
Well, Saddam didn't bring Iraq to the brink of annihilation, but Saddam put the country severely at risk through his rule.
Though I get the feeling that we're going to be doing some brooking. We shouldn't. We should take a hard line, but I'm afraid we won't.
This was 1945, and here we are still driving irresponsible militarism from the world.
It sucks, sure. But there it is. We're going to need to occupy the place until we can help it get its shit together. Lots of people won't like it. Tough. It needs to be done.
Sounds familiar, doesn't it?
This is the most important section, in my opinion. I've wondered about the wisdom of putting former Iraqi policemen back on the streets to try to maintain order. They're the face of the former regime. What needs to be done is an entire turnover in the Iraqi police, intelligence, and military structure. And many of the former officials need to be prosecuted for war crimes, most desirably by newly-formed Iraqi courts. And that last bit, about establishing freedom of religion, speech, and fundamental human rights. Well, that's pretty damned important. We don't need to just throw the country back to the Muslim clerics. That way lies madness.
Again, we need to stay until the job is done. And it seems impossible to me that that's going to be a matter of months. Realistically, it should take years.
Well, we shouldn't threaten to destroy Iraq, but we shouldn't be prancing around the edges of it either. We need to make it damned clear that we've come in to clean up the mess, and we're going to help them build a new Iraq from the ground up. We're not going to pussyfoot with the U.N. or France or Germany. They had their chance to do the right thing and they dropped the ball. Some of the toughest days are ahead. The inclination is to let resolve waver now that military action is drawing to a close. That would be a horrible mistake. Read/Post Comments (2) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
||||||
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |