Thinking as a Hobby 3477609 Curiosities served |
2004-03-04 1:35 PM Nader on Real Time Previous Entry :: Next Entry Read/Post Comments (3) I've been waiting for Bill Maher's website to post the transcript from when Nader was on, and now, finally, they have.
Let me just say, I agree with Nader's assessment about the entrenchment of the two-party system. And I think third party candidates can be healthy if they offer viable alternatives to the status quo. I think they're also healthy in their ability to talk straight about issues that the other candidates are unwilling to talk about. Which is why Nader is such an utter disappointment on all counts. When asked what issue he was talking about that the big party candidates weren't, here was his answer:
This is the issue that delineates Nader from the rest of the field: a hypothetical Chinese flu. Um...whatever, Ralph. So if Chinese killer flus are really large and looming problems, what's Ralph going to do about them? Well, here's an article he wrote on the subject.
Um...so were we talking about Chinese flus, or Iraq? Anyway, Nader says he wants new health treaties, more American scientists in China for early detection (by the way, why do they have to be American? Other countries don't have infectious disease experts?). And he wraps up with this:
Gosh, I'm glad Nader's not resorting to the politics of fear. Anyway...back to the interview. Maher asked Nader about Social Security:
Yup...that's right, folks. Here are some population pyramids every ten years for the past 50 years, showing the population makeup of the U.S. by age group. At the turn of the previous century, the graph really did look like a pyramid...that's why they name these things that way. But the pyramid is growing fatter at the top, as more and more people live longer and longer. Notice how much more the top of the graph has grown, and how the fattest part in 2000 are those in their 40's and 50's. Guess what? A lot of those people are going to stick around. They're going to retire, and they're going to want the money they paid into Social Security, and it won't be there. We need to get real about Social Security, and start transitioning it to a needs-based program, which is what it should have been in the first place. Not a perk that millions of elderly people get on top of their regular pensions...not walking around money for old folks who are living comfortably anyway, but a safety net for those who would be homeless or starving otherwise. Nader, on this issue, has got his damned head in the sand. As Maher puts it:
Yup. Anyway, then Maher asks him about his interview on Hardball:
Okay, so don't actually address the issue Maher brought up, Ralph...that many people think that being married and having kids is the ultimate sign of maturity. Nope...his answer is just that Matthews is a parody of himself. I guess this issue was beneath him. So then Maher brought out a cake shaped like a flaming Pinto, since it was Ralph's 70th birthday. And yeah, it was funny. But the interview had already left a sour taste in my mouth. You could tell that Maher, having voted for Nader, actually wanted to like him. You could tell that he served up questions he thought Nader could hit out of the park. But all Nader did was sit there on the stool and mutter a bunch of inane bullshit. The Chinese flu? Social Security is fine? I've said it before and I'll say it again: Oh, how I wish there were a decent third-party candidate this year. But there's not. And there's no way I'd be able to even bring myself to vote for Nader as a protest vote. Matthews may be a bit of an idiot, but it is Nader, in fact, who has become a parody of himself. Read/Post Comments (3) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
||||||
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |