Thinking as a Hobby 3478278 Curiosities served |
2007-03-19 11:53 AM More on 300 Previous Entry :: Next Entry Read/Post Comments (4) Hmmm...Kyle Smith of the New York Post thinks the movie could have easily been used as a Nazi training film:
Gosh, that seems a little harsh. This comes at the end of the review, so how is he justifying such remarks? Earlier he says:
So killing unwanted children gets you quotation marks around "culture"? Hmm, what other cultures might have practiced euthanizing children? I wonder... And I can't say I have a problem with ignoring religious counsel. How about he ignored the advice because he knew it was crap? The priests were lackies of the Persians, and (spoiler warning) so was at least one member of the counsel. And as far as taking no prisoners, how about they didn't have the logistical capability to hold or guard prisoners, since they numbered in the thousands and were fighting in a narrow, rocky pass? Um, duh. And a Nazi propaganda film? Yes, the movie lovingly visualizes violence, but I don't think it's mindless or in promotion of dictatorship. In fact it's the opposite. Xerxes is analog to Hitler, sweeping across the world and consuming everything in his path. Hiding behind the lines and sending waves of soldiers to die. I guess in Smith's version of the film (and I guess history), Leonides would have just bowed down and kissed the messengers hand, turned over his lands to Xerxes, and the whole thing could have been over in 5 minutes. Read/Post Comments (4) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
||||||
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |