I just don't get it....

According to Andrew Sullivan's weblog

GORE DID IT: The former vice-president's un-Midas touch is now given even more credence by Joe Trippi, in the New York Times Magazine:
If you were to give one reason for the campaign's collapse, what would it be?

TRIPPI: You have a party that's tried to make every rule that it can to stop an insurgent. But at the same time -- it's not Al Gore's endorsement -- what I'm saying is, him endorsing us was a good thing. But at the same time, the unintended consequence of it was that the second Al Gore endorsed Howard Dean, alarms went off in newsrooms and at every other campaign headquarters. At the campaign headquarters, they all had meetings and said, ''We've got to stop Howard Dean right this second.'' That's what the Al Gore endorsement meant. It meant, We've got to kill this guy or he's going to be the nominee.

C'mon, Joe. Stop being so nice. Gore killed off Dean. Some big Democrat should get Al to endorse Nader - soon.

Is this the same Al Gore that won the popular vote in 2000 and had the presidency stolen from him by the Supreme Court and Katherine Harris? Now, he's responsible for killing a candidacy just by endorsing it?

Now I'm all over "So if you can’t be with the one you love, love the one you’re with" but the Democrats take this to a whole new level!