lo fi samurai 163836 Curiosities served |
2009-09-06 2:54 PM Thoughts on the big G Previous Entry :: Next Entry Read/Post Comments (0) One of the hardest questions for me to answer is what religion I am. The simplest answer I can give is "all of them and none of them". I guess technically I am the closest to "taoism", but I am reluctant to claim that title (which as I understand it is the nature of the tao anyway).
At the beginning and the end of the day I don't see myself as religious at all, though I agree with and follow the core tenants of many religions. I don't have much desire to join a church communion or fellowship, and when I am honest with myself I never felt too comfortable when I did go to church services growing up. It always felt like I was wearing clothes I didn't want to wear and that didn't fit quite right. I feel better for the experience, but I didn't really feel it was for me. It's similar to when people ask me if I believe in God. How can I answer that with one word? In another post I described my belief in a "lower power". That's the closest I can come to describe what I see is the largest (and smallest) thing in existence (and non-existence). I certainly don't believe in a conscious God . I can't even say that I believe in a moral God, necessarily. I like the idea that "love is the center of all God's creation", but the creation itself is what "God" is in my mind. I read a Zen poem once referring to the spirit (ie, the "all spirit" of everything) as a river coming to a cliff to create a waterfall, only to join back as a river at the bottom of the valley. In the river the water is one and connected, not needing to make a distinction or definition of what it is. In the waterfall the river is divided, chaotic, and individualized. Once the water hits the valley, it is once again a moving, thriving one. It is as if it was never a waterfall. This poem made sense to me. I think one of the reasons why I have trouble labeling my spiritual belief is it feels as though I would be prolonging the waterfall for fear of that valley below. This, to me, is counter to the nature of God. A waterfall cannot exist without it's source, and with time it will return to form something that resembles it's source. This is powerful. This is subtlety. This is God, for me. Read/Post Comments (0) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
||||||
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |