I'm still a bit undecided on who I'm going to vote for come November. I can't quite pin it down to one particular candidate, although it varies from day to day. Michael Moore recently came out for Wesley Clark. Take that for what it's worth. It's interesting how fast things can change. From 2000 and Nader, to 2004 and Wesley Clark.

As long as he really stands behind all that he says he does, than I think right now he's the best Democratic candidate. But there's just so much in the air that I don't know about. My mind is far from made up.

Head to head, I think that Clark has an excellent shot at beating Bush. He has the international experience, he's a Southerner, he's level headed, and he supports a lot of issues that Democrats and liberals should be getting behind. I think that of all the candidates, Wesley Clark has the best shot at beating Bush head 2 head.

Time will tell I guess.

matt out