Ramblings on Writing Reviews, Rants, and Observations on SF/F/H I am a thirty-something speculative fiction writer. More importantly to this blog, I am a reader of science fiction, horror, and science fiction. Recently it came to my attention that there are very few places reviewing short stories in the genres that I love. I also had the epiphany that I had not been reading enough of these stories. So, an idea was born to address both of these issues. So, starting in September 2012, this silly little blog of mine that has more or less been gathering dust will be dedicated to looking at and reviewing short form works published both in print magazines and in on-line formats. Reviews will be posted at least once a month, hopefully more, and stories will be selected completely at my whim. However, if you have read something amazing, thought-provoking, or interesting, please feel free to drop me a recommendation. Because a big part of the point of this exercise is to improve my own writing by looking at people doing it successfully, I will only be selecting stories to look at from professional or semi-professional markets. Please note, however, because a big part of the point of this exercise is to improve my own writing by looking at people doing it successfully, I will only be selecting stories to look at from professional or semi-professional markets. I intend to write honest, and hopefully interesting, reviews to let people know more about the wide variety of fantastic (both in subject and quality) stories out there. There will be no personal attacks on authors and no excoriating hatchet jobs. There is nothing to be learned from reviewing truly bad work and nothing to be gained by being mean. I will not do it and, should I be so lucky as to get readers and commentators, I would ask that they not do so either. Be respectful and everyone gets to have a more interesting conversation. What I will do is to give my honest and reasoned reactions to stories and try to determine why or why not particular elements worked. I will try to acknowledge my personal biases and to become more open-minded about those things that are not in the realm of my personal preference. Also, because this is my blog and I can, there may be occasional entries on my own writing process, things I find interesting, or whatever else I feel inclined to add. This may all crash and burn spectacularly, but it's going to be a heck of a lot of fun in the meantime. |
||
:: HOME :: GET EMAIL UPDATES :: Ralan Market List :: WotF Contest :: Nancy Kress's Blog :: R-SPEC: Rochester Speculative Literature Association :: Writers and Books :: Magical Words :: EMAIL :: | ||
Read/Post Comments (0) |
2013-07-26 1:25 PM STORY REVIEW: "Hello, Said the Stick" "Hello, Said the Stick" by Michael Swanwick
Originally published in Analog, can be found online, Hugo short story nominee, 2003 I don't generally take on Hugo nominees. To obtain that status the stories generally have to be pretty damn good, and so I fear I might not have much to say. But, this one was requested, so here I go. First, I did like this story. It was simple and short, but Swanwick manages to incorporate a tremendous amount of back story and context into a tiny amount of space. There is a lot to learn here about brevity, word choice, and including just the right details. Also, under a clever little story lurks commentary on everything from the nature or warfare to sly acceptance of the costs of ambition. It's a story that takes only minutes to read, but if the reader is so inclined, can prompt observations for days afterwards. On the other hand, some readers could just read it and consider it inconsequential, even forgettable. It depends on how closely the text is read, and how likely the reader is to want to find deeper meanings. Because they aren't out there in the open--they are buried, some deeper than others. That may be both a good and bad thing. Like one of those 3-D posters where you have to unfocus your eyes to see the hidden image, it may be the reader misses the subtext entirely. Or creates it where none exists, squinting so hard to find the point they create one out of whole cloth. Obviously, given the award nomination, more readers than not found something. But, I wonder if a different set of people had been reading if this story would have been relegated to the annuls of the well-done, but not particularly memorable? It's a dangerous balancing act Swanwick performs, one I suspect would send lesser writers tumbling off the high wire. So, I guess my final opinion is, try this at your own risk. Read/Post Comments (0) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |