Thinking as a Hobby 3477465 Curiosities served |
2003-10-22 4:46 PM On-Line Legal Debate on the Pledge Previous Entry :: Next Entry Read/Post Comments (2) Over at TNR, legal experts Jeffrey Rosen and Roger T. Severino are engaged in an ongoing, letter-based debate on the Constitutionality of the students being led in the Pledge of Allegiance by public school teachers.
It strikes me how virtually every proponent of the status quo misrepresents the actual issue. Here's part of Severino's first entry:
Um, not to put too fine a point on it, but...bullshit. From the official court documentation:
and...
Which basically means, he wants the state to stop leading kids in the Pledge. He's not asking for the wording to be changed, and he's not asking for money. Yes, let's "clarify" the dispute, all right. What a jag-off. Again, Severino:
Well yeah...if anybody was actually calling for that. But hey...they're not! It's perfectly fine to have bibles in the school library, along with other religious texts. It's fine for "god", "Jesus", "Buddha", and plenty of other references to religious figures to be in textbooks. It is, in fact, important for students to be informed about the various belief systems that have existed historically and that exist today...they're an integral aspect of human society, and one cannot have an informed view of history or literature or politics without at least a cursory understanding of the tenets of the major world religions. But teachers are not supposed to endorse any religion, or any areligious viewpoint either. Their job, oddly enough, is to teach, not preach. They shouldn't be advocating religious viewpoints, or leading prayers, or leading pledges that implicitly recognize the existence of god. Read/Post Comments (2) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
||||||
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |