Thinking as a Hobby 3477570 Curiosities served |
2004-02-03 2:58 PM Bush Reading Newspapers Previous Entry :: Next Entry Read/Post Comments (7) Matt Yglesias asks the keen political question "Can we say the President is stupid?". He seems to answer the question himself (yes), mostly by pointing to Bush's admission that he doesn't get his news from newspapers:
Bill Maher even has a segment of his new show devoted to reading to President Bush things he's missing by not reading the newspaper:
Man, it's a good thing that Bill Maher's there to catch the important stories that might be falling through the cracks for Bush. Maher's segment could be a cute idea, but he shoots himself in the comedic foot by picking obscure environmental stories. Do we really want the President focused on vulture toxicity instead of...oh, about 40 billion other issues of more importance? But basically I take exception to all the bullshit about how, because Bush has said that he doesn't get his news from newspapers, that he's somehow shielded from reality. Here's the segment of the Diane Sawyer interview where Bush talks about this:
And from the earlier Brit Hume interview:
Now people who don't like Bush are going to point to these kinds of quotes and, like Bill Maher, assume that Bush is insulated from the real world, and that his advisors simply tell him what they think he wants to hear. But this seems like a case of Bush just not being able to articulate very well. To me it makes a certain amount of sense, and it would be better if he gave a specific example. If you want to find out how negotiations on a South American trade agreement are going, would you rather read about it in the newspaper or talk to the head of the department leading the negotiations? If you wanted to know how talks with North Korea were panning out, would you read the New York Times or ask Colin Powell? I know it's not necessarily an either/or, but it's a big country and a busy world, and in the name of efficiency, it probably does make a lot more sense for Bush to get brief on timely events (like the recent Ricin situation in the Senate):
Isn't it better that the President was briefed on the situation, presumably by law enforcement and health officials, rather than off CNN Headline News? This is the sort of criticism that frankly makes Bush's critics look rather stupid. I'd have more respect for those on the Left that criticize Bush if they stuck to the issues, rather than lame ad hominem attacks. Read/Post Comments (7) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
||||||
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |