Thinking as a Hobby 3477823 Curiosities served |
2004-10-01 9:11 AM Kerry's Plan on Iraq Previous Entry :: Next Entry Read/Post Comments (0) General consensus is that Kerry did well in the debate, and I'd agree.
But I think he still came across as extremely weak on Iraq, basically because his plan amounts to this: We're bearing most of the cost in Iraq, in terms of troops and money ("90% of the casualties and 90% of the cost", which he repeated several times). Other countries don't want to give money or troops because they don't like George Bush. If I'm elected, other countries will donate lots of troops and cash and relieve us of the burden. Now who the hell is buying that? Even hardcore supporters? The countries that don't support the war are doing so because it's unpopular in their countries. Kerry's election isn't gonna make France want to give more money. And we have something like 140,000 troops on the ground. Who the hell is gonna send a significant number of troops to relieve ours? Especially when the talk is that we need more troops there. And especially if the perception is that things are getting more dangerous. Kerry consistently makes it sound like his mere presence in office will be enough to lure the rest of the world to send in enough troops to relieve ours and to cover the costs...and that just ain't gonna happen. [Update:] Martin Peretz at The New Republic concurs:
Read/Post Comments (0) Previous Entry :: Next Entry Back to Top |
||||||
© 2001-2010 JournalScape.com. All rights reserved. All content rights reserved by the author. custsupport@journalscape.com |