Student "edition" found at {csi dot journalspace dot com}.

Maybe I shouldn't have started this blog now, not with everything that's been going on.

Slacker co-teacher is so pathetic in that he didn't attend the training for the new academic advising system, so that when his students started showing up, he had to call up the IT department every so often.

And when it came to being diligent enough to tell the students about their advising schedule, it was only to tell the other teachers that he would not entertain advisees beyond a certain date.

This is actually in line with the policy of the registrar's office to make the students afraid of being closed out on sections if they only enlist after course card distribution, but in his case, it's also due to the laziness of not wanting to stay in school more than necessary.

@@ It's funny, but no matter how I look at it, E-Frame still fails due to excessive absences. Taking the hard line from the student handbook, he right now has twelve absences.

But taking the more "considerate" route of only counting the times he showed up in class (no matter how late) as a third of an absence, he still ends up with more than six, which is the known limit.

It's just very annoying how he thinks he can come up with minimum effort on his own terms and expect to pass, even when he knows I'm his teacher and that I have my eye on him. Does he really expect to be reprimanded before he will shape up?

Isn't all those failures in my previous classes enough for him to make the supreme effort?

I really hope that he gets booted out of the program soon, because as far as I know, he has the lowest record of passing subjects so far, 9 units per term, in history, which, translates to around half number of failures per term that in other schools would have been enough to be expeled long ago.

Session 2291 admits now that there are students who "never learn". Class dismissed.