Student "edition" found at {thoughts dot com slash typed no space out no space loud slash blog}.

Maybe I shouldn't have started this blog now, not with everything that's been going on.

Let me just finish my story yesterday about the second ex-employee. Current employees don't like her going to their branch anymore, because she doesn't defend them against the main branch.

So one time that she said she would visit, they had to fake that they were out (it was past closing time), when in fact they were just inside ignoring her knocks on the back door.

Personally, if that were me, I would have given up in the first half hour. Especially now in the age of instantaneous communication, it's not worth it to wait for anyone without any word anymore.

So in the first place, her staying in the neighboring all night eatery from 11pm up to 6am is already pathetic.

And of course they're not going to admit they didn't want to open the door for her, no matter how much she repeated the accusation in the morning, especially after her first words.

And what were those words? It was about how dirty the place of business was, coming from the queen of obsessive compulsive cleaning herself. So what was that supposed to mean?

Was it a subtle hint that she was better than the current employees and that she should be taken back at a price?

And to think she was also complaining about her current place of work as being stricter than where she visited.

Lastly, she even tried to get some freebies, something the current employees enjoyed from their boss.

Naturally they weren't going to allow that, especially since she didn't even compliment any of the new things at the place since she left. There was even a jab that sure she could take what she was asking for, if it meant she wouldn't go back there again.

It's like the old saying goes, "If you lend someone a hundred bucks and you never see him again, it was worth it."

It was no surprise that there was a rescinding of the criticism, but with the local equivalent of a phrase that means "please be patient with me" which is not the same as "I'm sorry."

What irks at this point is that it's now possible for both ex-employees to talk about their experiences, and come to the conclusion that they were both treated unfairly, despite the fact that they were the ones with abusive behavior towards a kind management.

Also, the people there don't want to reply anymore to the "patience" text, because it might be used against them and shown to others while being taken out of context.

Session 2701 hopes to return to school related writing here tomorrow. Class dismissed.